Hi,

I agree with Francois.

You can send the QSIG/ISUP without SDP, and as far as the information
itself is concerned, I don't think the QSIG/ISUP and SDP is related.

So, I don't think mixed is a misstake. One question (as I wrote in
anther mail) is whether parallel would also be feasible.

Regards,

Christer 


> -----Original Message-----
> From: Francois Audet [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
> Sent: 23. toukokuuta 2007 23:37
> To: Dan Wing; Gonzalo Camarillo (JO/LMF)
> Cc: Paul Kyzivat; [email protected]; Christer Holmberg (JO/LMF)
> Subject: RE: [Sip] Support for Multipart/MIME
> 
>  
> > In RFC3204, the QSIG or ISUP parts do not appear to have 
> any meaning 
> > without the SDP.  Or do they?  For example, is it 
> meaningful for me to 
> > send an INVITE that has only the QSIG part (and no SDP)?
> 
> Sure: it's just a delayed offer answer. 
> 
> > > (And really, it's way too late to change 3204).
> > 
> > Even if consensus were to be formed that there was a mistake? 
> >  Obviously no such consensus has been formed, but I would 
> like to have 
> > the discussion.
> 
> I really don't think it's a mistake.
> 
> > If we do consider it acceptable to change RFC3261's requirements 
> > around MIME multipart support, I suggest it is reasonable 
> to analyze 
> > what we may have done wrong elsewhere around MIME with SIP.
> > 
> > > But, if I interpret your question in a broader sense, I 
> guess, the 
> > > question is "Do we need to say anything about
> > multipart/related?". I
> > > would extend it to parallel and digest...
> > 
> > And external-body, and all the other parts.  Yes, that is my 
> > underlying question in light of Gonzalo's document and 
> Cullen's stated 
> > desire for the SIP community to document multipart support.
> 
> Yeah, I think it would be worthwile to talk about it, but not 
> in the context of 3204.
> 
> Frankly, what I think we should say is "RECOMMEND don't use 
> unless some IETF RFC defines a use for them".
> 


_______________________________________________
Sip mailing list  https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sip
This list is for NEW development of the core SIP Protocol
Use [EMAIL PROTECTED] for questions on current sip
Use [EMAIL PROTECTED] for new developments on the application of sip

Reply via email to