Christer,

As best I understand, multipart/alternative assumes that you either do or don't "support" a particular alternative, and that the alternatives are arranged from least-preferred to most-preferred by the sender. The recipient is supposed to use the most-preferred (as defined by the sender) that it "supports".

I guess we could allow different attributes, besides content-type to be used to decide if a part is "supported", *if* we can come up with a well defined meaning for "supported".

I guess this could work for content-language. But I don't know about the text-friendly vs image-containing html. Maybe, but it needs better definition.

        Paul

Christer Holmberg (JO/LMF) wrote:
Hi,

Gonzalo's draft say that, when multipart/alternative is used, different
body parts can not have the same content type.

Below are a couple of use-cases where the same content type is used, and
which may still be feasible for alternative:

1.
Let's assume I have two HTML bodies. They both contain the same information, but one is "text friendly", while the other contains pictures etc. Now, is that alternative or mixed(or parallel)?
2.
Let's assume I have the same information, but in different languages - ie the Content-Language values are different. Is that alternative or Mixed(or parallel)?

Now, we may not have the expertise to determine whether alternative is
allowed or not in these cases. But, if the think there could be cases
where the same content type would be used for alternative, we need to
allow it.

Regards,

Christer


_______________________________________________
Sip mailing list  https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sip
This list is for NEW development of the core SIP Protocol
Use [EMAIL PROTECTED] for questions on current sip
Use [EMAIL PROTECTED] for new developments on the application of sip



_______________________________________________
Sip mailing list  https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sip
This list is for NEW development of the core SIP Protocol
Use [EMAIL PROTECTED] for questions on current sip
Use [EMAIL PROTECTED] for new developments on the application of sip

Reply via email to