> -----Original Message----- > From: Christer Holmberg (JO/LMF) > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Thursday, May 31, 2007 12:47 PM > To: Francois Audet; Dan Wing; [email protected] > Cc: Gonzalo Camarillo (JO/LMF) > Subject: RE: [Sip] MIME: MIME when only one body type > > > Hi, > > >I agree with Dan. > > > >I don't understand the use case in SIP of sending a Multipart > >with only one body. > > Again, I think I've seen INFOs and/or BYEs carrying ISUP informatio in > multipart, without any other body (unfortunately I have to > use the word > "think", because I don't have any real examples in front of me :) > > But, I have nothing against saying that one SHOULD NOT (or even MUST > NOT) SEND it. But, I do think one should be prepared to RECEIVE such > messages, in order to be backward compatible with existing > implementations which may not be fully compliant the draft.
I agree. > And, regarding Dan's example: if a client is not able to handle > multipart carrying only SDP, I don't think it will be able to handle a > multipart carrying SDP and something else either - and we > will have the > problem Francois presented earlier (the multipart, and the > SDP innit, is thrown away). Yep. But that's exactly why I don't think we should encourage unnecessary use of MIME -- it only tempts fate. -d _______________________________________________ Sip mailing list https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sip This list is for NEW development of the core SIP Protocol Use [EMAIL PROTECTED] for questions on current sip Use [EMAIL PROTECTED] for new developments on the application of sip
