Francois Audet wrote:
What I haven't heard is any voice strongly being against the
re-instatement of transport=tls (except perhaps myself, but I don't
care anymore: just want to move on).
FWIW, and for the record, I am also against the re-instatement of
"transport=tls" for much the same reasons that you had mentioned
in a previous email (c.f.
http://www1.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/sip/current/msg19371.html).
Plus, now that TLS is supported over other transports, we will
need to indicate the transport in the parameter as well.
- vijay
--
Vijay K. Gurbani, Bell Laboratories, Alcatel-Lucent
2701 Lucent Lane, Rm. 9F-546, Lisle, Illinois 60532 (USA)
Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED],bell-labs.com,acm.org}
WWW: http://www.alcatel-lucent.com/bell-labs
_______________________________________________
Sip mailing list https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sip
This list is for NEW development of the core SIP Protocol
Use [EMAIL PROTECTED] for questions on current sip
Use [EMAIL PROTECTED] for new developments on the application of sip
