Gilad Shaham wrote: > Hi Dean, > > I have seen that the draft defines the relationship between SIP and SIPS > and indicates that "A SIPS URI specifies that the resource be contacted > securely." > > I believe that IPSec can also achieve the same goal in terms of > security. My question is shouldn't this specification define this as an > acceptable possibility. >
I initially supported this position, but the WG has stepped back from it FOR THIS DRAFT in the interest of making SIPS as meaningful as we can without heavy modification to the protocol (and with some realization that SIPS alone doesn't mean all that much). Your suggestion is slipping into "futures" work problems, much like the cypher-suites draft. -- Dean _______________________________________________ Sip mailing list https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sip This list is for NEW development of the core SIP Protocol Use [EMAIL PROTECTED] for questions on current sip Use [EMAIL PROTECTED] for new developments on the application of sip
