I didn't get any feedback from the list on this topic that I'm trying
to close.

Comments? 

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Audet, Francois (SC100:3055) 
> Sent: Thursday, June 07, 2007 14:14
> To: Jonathan Rosenberg; Jeroen van Bemmel
> Cc: [email protected]
> Subject: RE: [Sip] Re: draft-ietf-sip-sips-04: 403 instead of 
> last hop exception
> 
>  
> 
> > However to be honest we need to explicitly indicate that 
> the problem 
> > was sips-to-sip so that the original UA can decide whether 
> to retry. 
> > Thus I'd suggest a new 4xx code.
> 
> 
> I'm fine with this.
> 
> 
> Let me propose 418 (SIPS Not Allowed)
> 
> With the following description:
> 
>       The server cannot process the request because the SIPS 
> scheme is not 
>       allowed. The UAC SHOULD retry the request, this time, 
> using a SIP URI.
>       This response differs from 416 in that the server 
> recognizes the SIPS
>       URI, but it is not allowed (e.g., because the UAS 
> registered with
>       a SIP Contact header field).
> 
> (And the current text on proxies not recursing on this will apply)
> 
> (Note: existing implementations will treat it as 400, which 
> is intended behavior, i.e., it will not automatically 
> re-attempt anything).
> 
> If you support this, or are against this, please voice your 
> opinion. If you don't care that much, just don't say anything :^)
> 
> Now, the next logical quesiton is for sip-to-sips.
> 
> Currently, the text has this text about proxies that may 
> decide to use either 403 or 3XX to redirect to a SIPS URI. We 
> have a similar problem here that some proxy in the middle may 
> decide to recurse on it (which would break the last hop 
> upgrade prohibition).
> 
> Do we need a 419 (SIPS Required) as well? Or are we happy 
> with the current text?
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Sip mailing list  https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sip
> This list is for NEW development of the core SIP Protocol Use 
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] for questions on current sip 
> Use [EMAIL PROTECTED] for new developments on the application of sip
> 


_______________________________________________
Sip mailing list  https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sip
This list is for NEW development of the core SIP Protocol
Use [EMAIL PROTECTED] for questions on current sip
Use [EMAIL PROTECTED] for new developments on the application of sip

Reply via email to