SIP WG
Here is a new ID I've written because of implementation
considerations to allow a SIP Resource-Priority header (RPH) in
responses, which RFC 4412 currently disallows, assuming only that
stateful devices will use RPH. There have been many requests to have
this "only stateful devices" restriction relaxed, in certain
scenarios. This ID does this, and proposes how IANA is changed
accordingly wrt RPH. This ID does nothing else.
Comments are appreciated.
A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts
directories.
Title : Allowing SIP Resource Priority Header in
SIP Responses
Author(s) : J. Polk
Filename : draft-polk-sip-rph-in-responses-00.txt
Pages : 6
Date : 2007-6-15
The Session Initiation Protocol (SIP) Resource Priority Header
(RPH), in its current form, is ignored in SIP responses. This was a
design choice during RFC 4412's development. This is now considered
a bad design choice in certain scenarios. This document corrects
RFC 4412's communications model by optionally allowing a SIP server
or user agent client to process the Resource-Priority Header in a
response.
A URL for this Internet-Draft is:
http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-polk-sip-rph-in-responses-00.txt
_______________________________________________
Sip mailing list https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sip
This list is for NEW development of the core SIP Protocol
Use [EMAIL PROTECTED] for questions on current sip
Use [EMAIL PROTECTED] for new developments on the application of sip
