Re: [Sip] Query about test case in [ETSI TS 102 027-2 V4.1.1 (2006-07)]

[Byron Campen]

If the original BYE had a magic cookie, then a second BYE _without_ it is a new transaction (the language in 3261 doesn't say this explicitly, but it is assumed that a UAC would not send one BYE with a magic cookie, and a retransmission without). Additionally, since we compare the topmost Via in the 2543 tid case, changing the branch param between the two BYEs will also cause the match to fail. This test case is incorrect.

Best regards,
Byron Campen

test?

 But the [Ref] listed in the test case is reference to RFC3261.


the request matching transaction at all.

Lavis

-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, May 26, 2007 5:24 AM
To: sip@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [Sip] Query about test case in [ETSI TS 102 027-2 V4.1.1
(2006-07)]

   From: Lavis Chow <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>


of
   a BYE request, including a Via header set with a different branch
parameter

   tag, Call-ID, CSeq and top Via header identical as in the first BYE
request,
   repeats its last response.


Does this test make sense in that light?

Dale


_______________________________________________
Sip mailing list  https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sip
This list is for NEW development of the core SIP Protocol Use
[EMAIL PROTECTED] for questions on current sip Use
[EMAIL PROTECTED] for new developments on the application of sip

This e-mail and its attachments contain confidential information from
HUAWEI, which

use of the

total or partial
disclosure, reproduction, or dissemination) by persons other than the
intended

notify the sender by
phone or email immediately and delete it!




_______________________________________________
Sip mailing list  https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sip
This list is for NEW development of the core SIP Protocol
Use [EMAIL PROTECTED] for questions on current sip
Use [EMAIL PROTECTED] for new developments on the application of sip

Not sure the purpose is the "Purpose" list in the test case or for 2543 And for RFC2543(not bis02 afterwards) server, it didn't check the Via for Purpose: Ensure that the IUT in a server BYE Proceeding state, on receipt without the magic cookie "z9hG4bK" but with the Request-URI, To tag, From Since "z9hG4bK" is not to be present, it may be testing RFC 2543 behavior. is intended only for the person or entity whose address is listed above. Any information contained herein in any way (including, but not limited to, recipient(s) is prohibited. If you receive this e-mail in error, please

smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature

_______________________________________________
Sip mailing list  https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sip
This list is for NEW development of the core SIP Protocol
Use [EMAIL PROTECTED] for questions on current sip
Use [EMAIL PROTECTED] for new developments on the application of sip