Hi,

A small comment.

I don't think we in the draft should say that the UA forks. Because, I don't 
think the UA behavior is different from when it receives a 3xx response for 
e.g. an initial INVITE, is it? It uses the contact in the response to initiates 
new initial request. We don't call that forking, do we?

Regards,

Christer



> -----Original Message-----
> From: Vijay K. Gurbani [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
> Sent: 19. kesäkuuta 2007 19:35
> To: Francois Audet
> Cc: IETF SIP List; Paul Kyzivat; Elwell,John; Dean Willis
> Subject: Re: [Sip] draft-gurbani-sip-sipsec-01
> 
> Francois Audet wrote:
> > Agreed.
> > 
> > Basically, say the "CONNECT" ended up in 3 different 
> directions after 
> > a 3XX with 3 contacts. The UAC would set up the end-to-end TLS 
> > connections from the UAC to the 3 contacts.
> > 
> > Then the INVITEs have no intermediaries, so they can't fork.
> 
> OK; returning a 3xx seems to be preferred.  Then, so that we 
> can update the next revision appropriately, here is some rough text:
> 
>    A proxy that accesses a location service to route a CONNECT
>    request and discovers more than one contact bound to that
>    AoR MUST format a 3xx-class response with the contacts discovered
>    from the location service.  This response is subsequently
>    sent upstream.
> 
>    A proxy that receives a 3xx-class response as a result of
>    proxying a CONNECT request downstream MUST NOT recurse on the
>    receipt of the 3xx-class response.  Instead, it MUST send the
>    response upstream.
> 
>    When a user agent receives a 3xx-class response from its
>    downstream server with multiple Contact headers, it MAY decide
>    to fork in parallel or in serial depending on its software
>    capabilities and configuration policies.  Alternatively, it
>    MAY analyze the received Contact headers and choose to send it
>    to a particular destination that it suspects would stand the
>    best chance of eliciting a successful response.
> 
> OK?
> 
> - vijay
> --
> Vijay K. Gurbani, Bell Laboratories, Alcatel-Lucent
> 2701 Lucent Lane, Rm. 9F-546, Lisle, Illinois 60532 (USA)
> Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED],bell-labs.com,acm.org}
> WWW:   http://www.alcatel-lucent.com/bell-labs
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Sip mailing list  https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sip
> This list is for NEW development of the core SIP Protocol
> Use [EMAIL PROTECTED] for questions on current sip
> Use [EMAIL PROTECTED] for new developments on the application of sip
> 


_______________________________________________
Sip mailing list  https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sip
This list is for NEW development of the core SIP Protocol
Use [EMAIL PROTECTED] for questions on current sip
Use [EMAIL PROTECTED] for new developments on the application of sip

Reply via email to