Vijay K. Gurbani wrote: > Dean Willis wrote: > vkg> It looks like the drafts and a substantive body of the work in > vkg> this area is out there; just needs to be organized for a more > vkg> amenable deadline. But, I may be mistaken... >> >> Otherwise said, you think the milestones in question were essentially >> made redundandt by the adoption of the more-focused drafts? > > No; I thought that the focused drafts were *leading* to the milestone. > But this may be my mis-interpretation of how a WG is chartered. Is > it the case that it is one draft per milestone? Or could a series > of drafts satisfy one milestone?
Depends on how your milestones are written -- ours are generally structured "one milestone, one draft" rather like riots and Texas Rangers. Usually a charter will have major planks, like "Clarify SIP security" and then milestones (aka "deliverables") will be approved if they support a plank. > Doesn't S15 of sip-hitchhikers-guide-03 > (http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-sip-hitchhikers-guide-03#section-15) > come close to providing some structure to the various security- > related drafts? Plus, if sip-hitchhikers-guide is the last document > that the WG produces, then it will keep up -- thanks to Jonathan -- > with newer technologies (SAML), protocols (DTLS) and documents as > they are adopted by the WG. Good question. -- Dean _______________________________________________ Sip mailing list https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sip This list is for NEW development of the core SIP Protocol Use [EMAIL PROTECTED] for questions on current sip Use [EMAIL PROTECTED] for new developments on the application of sip
