In the meeting, the issue of the error code to be used when the wrong URI is used in a request-URI (i.e., sip instead of sips, or vice-versa) came up.
The status quo is 2 new error codes (418 and 419). Another proposal was to use only one (i.e., 418 with 2 new headers). That proposal did not seem to get much traction. And people were not very with the status quo either. Another proposal was to use 480 (Temporarily Unavailable) and NOT to use an explicit indication of the required/supported URIs (SIP, SIPS, etc.). Of course, one can always put text in the reason phrase to describe the error for displaying to the end-use. After talking to all the individual who seemed to have strong opinions on this topic, it appears that the 480 approach is the preferred approach. Please let the list know if you are strongly opposed to this outcome, along with the reasons behind your opposition. This is the last remaining issue to be closed in the draft, as a result of WGLC. _______________________________________________ Sip mailing list https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sip This list is for NEW development of the core SIP Protocol Use [EMAIL PROTECTED] for questions on current sip Use [EMAIL PROTECTED] for new developments on the application of sip
