I'd rather not institutionalize advertising in ietf standards.
BUT, if we can get an agreement that all advertisements, of any sort,
MUST be labeled with the "advertisement" content-disposition.
Paul
Qian Sun wrote:
Hi, Dean
Sorry for late response. Do you mean "advertisement" content always is needed to
'render'? So a single content disposition "advertisement" is enough.
In addition, some content body (e.g. Geolocation or advertisement) may be
inserted or modified by intermediary. Could we specify a common way for
indicating the source of inserted content body? For example, define a new MIME
header: Content-Insertedby. A B2BUA may insert a content body including AD like
this:
Content-Type: text/plain
Content-Disposition: advertisement
Content-Insertedby: AD-Agent <sip: [EMAIL PROTECTED]>
McDonald, i'm lovin' it!
Opinion?
Cheers,
Qian
-----Original Message-----
From: Dean Willis [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, July 20, 2007 6:45 PM
To: Qian Sun
Cc: 'Paul Kyzivat'; 'Gonzalo Camarillo'; 'sip'
Subject: Re: Content-Disposition in multiparts WAS (Re: [Sip] Draft slides
forbody (MIME) handling)
Qian Sun wrote:
If we define a new Content Disposition type "advertisement" so that
the operator or service provider may insert advertisement in the all
kinds of message body. And we want the advertisement content 'render'
to the users. Could we use multiple content dispositions
("advertisement" and 'render') for a single content part? Or only
define a new Content Disposition Parameters "advertisement" instead?
So is there a need to ever use "advertisement" in conjunction with
something besides "render"?
--
Dean
_______________________________________________
Sip mailing list https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sip
This list is for NEW development of the core SIP Protocol
Use [EMAIL PROTECTED] for questions on current sip
Use [EMAIL PROTECTED] for new developments on the application of sip
