Magnus Westerlund <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on 08/01/2007 10:14:50 AM:
> Janet P Gunn skrev: > > > > Magnus, > > > > You might want to add- > > > > draft-polk-tsvwg-signaled-domain-id-00.txt > > Well, I want to be somewhat restricted in adding individual work into > the liaison. Also to me it is not clear how this is applicable in the > emergency context. Well, you included draft-polk-sip-rph-new-namespaces-01, and draft-polk-tsvwg-signaled-domain-id-00 addresses the same scenarios. It would make sense to include either both or neither. > > > and > > draft-polk-ecrit-local-emergency-rph-namespace-01.txt > > > > Well, I got another comment about ECRIT WG document which we hadn't > considered. I will contact the WG chairs and see what they say. Yes, ecrit should make the call. But I know at least one other stds body ( PacketCable PKT2 0-SP-RSTF-D01-060330 TCHG) is addressing it. Janet > > Cheers > > Magnus Westerlund > > IETF Transport Area Director & TSVWG Chair > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > Multimedia Technologies, Ericsson Research EAB/TVM/M > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > Ericsson AB | Phone +46 8 4048287 > Torshamsgatan 23 | Fax +46 8 7575550 > S-164 80 Stockholm, Sweden | mailto: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > ----------------------------------------------------------------------
_______________________________________________ Sip mailing list https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sip This list is for NEW development of the core SIP Protocol Use [EMAIL PROTECTED] for questions on current sip Use [EMAIL PROTECTED] for new developments on the application of sip
