On 10/30/07 11:16 AM, Hadriel Kaplan wrote:
Yeah I was thinking the same thing - if there are two ways someone will surely do one and not the other and we'll have problems. I was just thinking someone may come up with one that makes sense for both, in different usage contexts. But I guess that's really 2 different package types that may just happen to share a defining RFC or have the same registered package name, but are really two separate "things". Regardless, I think it's safer to say for now the two package types are unrelated.
Excellent. /a _______________________________________________ Sip mailing list https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sip This list is for NEW development of the core SIP Protocol Use [EMAIL PROTECTED] for questions on current sip Use [EMAIL PROTECTED] for new developments on the application of sip
