I'm fine with it.
> -----Original Message----- > From: Jonathan Rosenberg [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Thursday, November 01, 2007 13:46 > To: Audet, Francois (SC100:3055) > Cc: Stucker, Brian (RICH1:AR00); [email protected]; Avshalom > Houri; [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: [RAI] RAI review of draft-ietf-sip-hitchhikers-guide-03 > > The document includes any normative sip extension once it has > been adopted as a WG Item. So this does include stuff that is > "earlier" in the process; for example the sip-saml stuff > which (IMHO) is still a little on the early side. But once it > is a wg item it gets in there. I still think its fine to > publish hitchhikers as an RFC with those as references (to drafts). _______________________________________________ Sip mailing list https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sip This list is for NEW development of the core SIP Protocol Use [EMAIL PROTECTED] for questions on current sip Use [EMAIL PROTECTED] for new developments on the application of sip
