Can someone familiar with the issue also check the ABNF in RFC 4566
(SDP)? From a quick look, it seems that it has a similar problem...
Colin
On 19 Nov 2007, at 19:38, Adam Roach wrote:
For the record: this seems to be a real problem in the original
ABNF, and the proposed fix appears correct to me. I support adding
this to the next batch of essential corrections.
/a
Vijay K. Gurbani wrote:
Folks: While performing the Gen-ART review of the
draft-ietf-sipping-ipv6-torture-test document, an extant bug in
the IPv6 ABNF production rules of RFC3261 was discovered.
A quick dialog with the chairs resulted in the understanding
that this could potentially be fixed as part of the SIP essential
corrections process, once it was ratified by the WG.
Brian and I have submitted a short draft describing this bug and
its resolution to the IETF. Until it appears in the archives, you
can get a copy from
https://svn.resiprocate.org/rep/ietf-drafts/gurbani/sip-ipv6-abnf/
draft-gurbani-sip-ipv6-abnf-fix-00.txt
https://svn.resiprocate.org/rep/ietf-drafts/gurbani/sip-ipv6-abnf/
draft-gurbani-sip-ipv6-abnf-fix-00.html
Thanks.
- vijay
--
Colin Perkins
http://csperkins.org/
_______________________________________________
Sip mailing list https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sip
This list is for NEW development of the core SIP Protocol
Use [EMAIL PROTECTED] for questions on current sip
Use [EMAIL PROTECTED] for new developments on the application of sip
