Dean Willis wrote:
It's the "logical product" of the essential corrections process.
Each draft in the essential corrections process has to specify
line-by-line changes to the RFC it is correcting. If we were to extract
those changes and apply them to the source, we would get the "tracking
draft" I'm talking about.
OK; I am with you now. In that case, yes, maintaining one draft
is preferable.
This also means that -- as Jonathan said earlier -- we have to be
careful as to what constitutes an essential correction vs. new
functionality.
- vijay
--
Vijay K. Gurbani, Bell Laboratories, Alcatel-Lucent
2701 Lucent Lane, Rm. 9F-546, Lisle, Illinois 60532 (USA)
Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED],bell-labs.com,acm.org}
WWW: http://www.alcatel-lucent.com/bell-labs
_______________________________________________
Sip mailing list https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sip
This list is for NEW development of the core SIP Protocol
Use [EMAIL PROTECTED] for questions on current sip
Use [EMAIL PROTECTED] for new developments on the application of sip
