Since the proxy supports loose routing, for subsequent requests on the dialog, the request-uri should be the Contact header uri and Record-Route header value should be put in Route header.
Sanjay >-----Original Message----- >From: Pulat Ugan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] >Sent: Wednesday, December 26, 2007 6:36 PM >To: [email protected] >Subject: [Sip] Processing Record Route Header in 200 OK For >Further Requests > >Hi, > >When a UA gets record-route header and contact header in 200 >OK. like below >------------------------------------------------ >contact:sip:{fqdn}:5060 >Record-Route:<sip:{ip};lr=on;ftag=100428709;vsf=AAAAAAAEFwQNBB8 >EChgLATU1Mzc3NkA2My4yNTEuMjIuODI-> > >What should be the uri in the re-invite message to put UAS on >hold.. And if we use the record-route header as uri, >should/may we put the contact header in 200 OK as route header? > >And the issue I am having for the end of above scenario; >should uri of ACK message be contact header coming from UAS in >200 OK regardless of whatever record-route or contact header >we previously got in initial call setup.? > >I will really appreciate if anyone can suggest any >reference-document which is including sample flows about >processing record-route headers on UAC side. > >Thanks.. > > > > >_______________________________________________________________ >_____________________ >Never miss a thing. Make Yahoo your home page. >http://www.yahoo.com/r/hs > > > >_______________________________________________ >Sip mailing list https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sip >This list is for NEW development of the core SIP Protocol Use >[EMAIL PROTECTED] for questions on current sip >Use [EMAIL PROTECTED] for new developments on the application of sip > _______________________________________________ Sip mailing list https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sip This list is for NEW development of the core SIP Protocol Use [EMAIL PROTECTED] for questions on current sip Use [EMAIL PROTECTED] for new developments on the application of sip
