The SIP, SIPPING and MEDIACTRL chairs (or at least a representative collection
of them) did get together to consider this issue, and decided that as the work
(as currently proposed) did not in fact extend SIP, that MEDIACTRL should
retain the work.
SDP extensions are proposed to MMUSIC, and that would appear to be appropriate.
At some point when the work is complete enough for review, it was agreed that
RAI wide review of this document should occur, and one of the review experts in
the SIP WG will be jumped on at that point to review the solution.
We did not discuss whether the solution adopted by the draft was the correct
solution - if people in the SIP WG have concerns, then please address them to
the MEDIACTRL WG. If you are not participants in that WG then we (the SIP
chairs) will be pleased to forward on comments.
Regards
Keith
PS: My understanding of the various charters is that SIP does not generate
requirements for development of SIP, except in the security area. However it
can charter work based on requirements from any appropriate working group,
which includes among others, both SIPPING and MEDIACTRL. I suspect the ADs
would want to be confident that the appropriate experts had contributed to the
appropriate requirements.
________________________________
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Hisham
Khartabil
Sent: Thursday, February 14, 2008 6:39 AM
To: Dean Willis
Cc: IETF SIP List
Subject: Re: [Sip] Request to consider media control framework
andrequirements
My opinion is that those requirements need to go to sipping first for
discussion as sipping is, as I understand it, chartered to agree on
requirements before any extension work is taken up by the sip wg.
Thanks,
Hisham
On 01/02/2008, Dean Willis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
The media control group has produced a requirements-oriented
draft
that they would like to meet with SIP, and would like the SIP
working
group to take on the work of meeting those requirements.
Here's a link to the draft:
http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-mediactrl-sip-control-framework-00
Do you folks think these requirements are sufficiently cooked
to work
with, or do we need to punt this football back to the senders or
perhaps lateral it to SIPPING for a little more thought?
--
Dean
_______________________________________________
Sip mailing list http://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sip
This list is for NEW development of the core SIP Protocol
Use [EMAIL PROTECTED] for questions on current sip
Use [EMAIL PROTECTED] for new developments on the application
of sip
_______________________________________________
Sip mailing list http://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sip
This list is for NEW development of the core SIP Protocol
Use [EMAIL PROTECTED] for questions on current sip
Use [EMAIL PROTECTED] for new developments on the application of sip
