Hi Dean, One thing missing from your list is INFO. I am not sure whether we are "late" or not, but just keep in minds that there are other SDOs which may need the output. I am not sure how much time we would need to discuss it, but since we now have collected use-cases etc I think we should make some kind of decission on how to move forward. Another thing missing, which has been discussed (again) lately is the how-to-reject-an-offer-in-PRACK. I wouldn't say that we are late on that, and for now I guess we can keep the discussion on the list if there is no time at the meeting. Regards, Christer
________________________________ From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] on behalf of Dean Willis Sent: Sat 16/02/2008 09:23 To: sip@ietf.org Subject: [Sip] Headsup on Short Agenda for IETF 71 It appears that we will get only 2 hours of working group meeting time in Philadelphia. That means we're going to have to be VERY efficient with our use of time. What are the mosr important things? The things we REALLY need to talk about? Inquiring minds want to know. Here are the things on our charter we're currently late on: 1) Outbound 2) SIPS (which I think is pretty much done) 3) Diagnostic Responses 4) Example security flows 5) Extensions to SIP UA Profile Delivery Change Notification Event Package for XCAP 6) Location Conveyance with SIP 7) Connection reuse mechanism 8) Session Policies 9) Etags in conditional notification 10) Using SAML for SIP 11) New resource priority namespaces for DISA 12) Requirements for media keying 13) X.509 Certificates for TLS use in SIP (done?) 14) X.509 extended key usage for SIP (done?) 15) Roadmap for SIP 16) Delivering request-URI and parameters to UAS via proxy 17) Establishment of secure media sessions using DTLS-SRT 18) MIME body handling in SIP 19) Identify requirements for test matrix to move SIP to Draft Standard And the things we aren't late on yet: 1) Essential corrections to RFC 3261 (1st batch) 2) Mechanisms for UA initiated privacy to WGLC So c'mon, people. What do we need to talk about? And why aren't we talking about it on the list already? -- Dean _______________________________________________ Sip mailing list http://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sip This list is for NEW development of the core SIP Protocol Use [EMAIL PROTECTED] for questions on current sip Use [EMAIL PROTECTED] for new developments on the application of sip _______________________________________________ Sip mailing list http://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sip This list is for NEW development of the core SIP Protocol Use [EMAIL PROTECTED] for questions on current sip Use [EMAIL PROTECTED] for new developments on the application of sip
