And I would think the two X.509-cert related drafts could be combined and take less than 30 minutes.
I agree with Jonathan about the phone number/identity topic - considering the discussion-leader field says "Most of the Working Group", it will take the allotted 10 minutes just to pass the microphone around. ;) -hadriel > -----Original Message----- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of > Jonathan Rosenberg > Sent: Thursday, February 28, 2008 6:01 PM > To: Dean Willis > Cc: IETF SIP List; Cullen Jennings > Subject: Re: [Sip] Revised agenda for SIP -- needs more work yet > > 10 minutes on the phone number dichotomy thing isn't going to be even > close enough to cut it. It should be either zero or a more significant > number. > > We have 30 minutes on media security. The only chartered item there is > the requiremetns document which I thought was mostly done. Why is there > so much time dedicated to this? I would rather move that to INFO or the > identity mess. > > -Jonathan R. _______________________________________________ Sip mailing list https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sip This list is for NEW development of the core SIP Protocol Use [EMAIL PROTECTED] for questions on current sip Use [EMAIL PROTECTED] for new developments on the application of sip
