while I agree that fixing premature dropping of transaction context is the right way to go, I'm wondering if we are not overstandizing with requiring a proxy server to drop replies without related transaction context.
My esthetic preference is not to standardize this as a MUST and document the well-known relaying risks (possibly in form of a SHOULD recommendation). It appears to me that there are valid cases (say failover in trusted-environment) where it can be more benefecial to complete transactions statelessly than protection against relaying. (which is not very strong anyhow). -jiri -- Jiri Kuthan http://iptel.org/~jiri/ _______________________________________________ Sip mailing list https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sip This list is for NEW development of the core SIP Protocol Use [EMAIL PROTECTED] for questions on current sip Use [EMAIL PROTECTED] for new developments on the application of sip
