On 3/12/08 9:48 PM, Paul Kyzivat wrote: > Yet, if I normally get calls from: > > sip:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > and then later get a call from > > sip:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > then many people seem to think that only the number should be displayed. > >
Actually, I think there is a subtle but critical correction to be made here. If I understand correctly, people want the two identifiers you cite to be considered different, and believe that the domain should be displayed. However, if you change your example to "sip:[EMAIL PROTECTED];user=phone" and "sip:[EMAIL PROTECTED];user=phone", then I suspect your statement stands. And I'm not sure that treating these as the same entity is wrong -- there's an indication that the user portion is formatted in a specific, well-defined way that other parties are expected to be able to interpret according to well-defined rules (RFC 3966). Without "user=phone", that's not true. /a _______________________________________________ Sip mailing list https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sip This list is for NEW development of the core SIP Protocol Use [EMAIL PROTECTED] for questions on current sip Use [EMAIL PROTECTED] for new developments on the application of sip
