Hi, I have a query regarding the 302 (Temporarily Moved) message flow shown in RFC 3665.
Essentially if a SIP client receives a 302 message in response to an INVITE it should ACK this message and then using the address in the contact field send a new INVITE request. In the message flow shown in RFC 3665 (see section 3.6. Session via Redirect and Proxy Servers with SDP in ACK) the new INVITE request has the same To field, From field, To Tag and Call ID - the Request URI uses the address specified in the Contact field of the 302 response. Essentially this new INVITE is part of the same dialog but has a different Request URI. My questions are: Is the 302 response not a final response? Does it not end the dialog? Shouldn't the new INVITE have new Call ID, tags etc. and shouldn't the address from the Contact field be in the Request URI and To field of the new INVITE request? Regards, Richard. _______________________________________________ Sip mailing list https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sip This list is for NEW development of the core SIP Protocol Use [EMAIL PROTECTED] for questions on current sip Use [EMAIL PROTECTED] for new developments on the application of sip
