On Mar 19, 2008, at 12:30 PM, Dean Willis wrote: > > > > > My sense that the WG was somewhat shocked by the proposal that we > place this draft into the essential corrections process. > I'm not exactly certain we had agreement on making domain-certs an > "essential correction" according to the current process.
OK - no worry , that is fine. I think I must have got the wrong idea from part of the draft where it quotes parts of 3261 and says that 3261 is incorrect. It was my sense of where I suspected things where going from the discussion but clearly I must have got this wrong. I wasn't trying to say anything about how we move the domain-certs document forward - just commenting on dependency issue. _______________________________________________ Sip mailing list https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sip This list is for NEW development of the core SIP Protocol Use [EMAIL PROTECTED] for questions on current sip Use [EMAIL PROTECTED] for new developments on the application of sip
