From: "James M. Polk" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

   >    I believe the To: field is always supposed to be urn:service:sos,
   >    regardless of the choice in how to do this.  I don't know if this
   >    helps the point you're making...
   >
   >I don't think people expect the To field to control either the routing
   >or the prioritization, so I was being lazy about its value.

   fair - but this could be something to check against in most cases, right?

It would guard against error, but not fraud.  The problem is that
Jonathan's observation is correct:  To prevent fraud, prioritization
must be controlled by the same datum that controls routing.

Dale
_______________________________________________
Sip mailing list  https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sip
This list is for NEW development of the core SIP Protocol
Use [EMAIL PROTECTED] for questions on current sip
Use [EMAIL PROTECTED] for new developments on the application of sip

Reply via email to