On Apr 13, 2008, at 7:02 PM, Francois Audet wrote: > I understand what you are saying. > > But I have difficulty imagining a case where the owner of the domain > of the > service provider or enterprise (example.com) would not be able to > reach a > PSTN gateway.
The problem is we're talking about TWO service providers, and reaching the wrong one's gateway. > > > I guess you are worried about [EMAIL PROTECTED] phoning [EMAIL PROTECTED] and > b.com > doesn't have > a gateway but wants to forward to PSTN (and wants the originating to > fork > the bill). So it sends tel URI instead. Sure, but again, I doubt it > will > work very well. It has the potential to work well, whereas what we have now doesn't. > > > I guess you could cheat and put a.com in the SIP contact. I think > there are > lots of cases where the domain will be ignored anyways. > > Again, don't shoot the messenger: it makes sense to me to use Tel > URI for > this. I am just saying it may cause interop problems. Maybe that's > ok, and > maybe implementations will start implementing tel URI. I've no doubt that there will be interop problems. That's what happens when you specify something that has previously been unspecified and left to whim or caprice. -- Dean _______________________________________________ Sip mailing list https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sip This list is for NEW development of the core SIP Protocol Use [EMAIL PROTECTED] for questions on current sip Use [EMAIL PROTECTED] for new developments on the application of sip
