On Apr 18, 2008, at 4:38 PM, Ben Campbell wrote: > > On Apr 12, 2008, at 4:00 AM, Dean Willis wrote: > > [...] > >> If we made it mandatory for a PSTN gateway to assert identities using >> user=phone and documented that Identity headers over an identity with >> a user=phone parameter do not assert the "user part" of that >> identity, >> then I think we'd have a complete solution. > > [...] > > I think you would need to extend that to be PSTN gateways that do > not do some sort of caller authentication. As we discussed > separately, it's perfectly possible for a PSTN gateway to require a > PIN from a caller, and therefore be able tp assert a stronger > identity than it could from caller id. In that scenario, would you > expect the "user=phone" parameter to apply? >
How would you differentiate an an authenticating gateway from a non- authenticating gateway downstream? -- Dean _______________________________________________ Sip mailing list https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sip This list is for NEW development of the core SIP Protocol Use [EMAIL PROTECTED] for questions on current sip Use [EMAIL PROTECTED] for new developments on the application of sip
