> I think this is the first time I've seen a > specification that causes a proxy to modify > a Via that was already in the request.
RFC 3581 performs a similar modification concerning rport. > So we really want to do this, or do we want > the proxy to be adding its own Via with "keep=yes"? The draft's proposed mechanism allows support and desired use to be clearly indicated by both sender and receiver at a hop level. Such a concept outbound/keepalive stuff was briefly discussed back in 2006: http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/sip/current/msg13733.html _______________________________________________ Sip mailing list https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sip This list is for NEW development of the core SIP Protocol Use [EMAIL PROTECTED] for questions on current sip Use [EMAIL PROTECTED] for new developments on the application of sip
