(As SIP WG cochair)
This has been raised in the SIP group a couple of times, and we have not
yet gained an idea of whether to proceed with it in the SIP WG or not.
There have been a couple of technical comments raised in the past from
the security experts; my understanding is that these have now been
clarified.
I believe in the past there has been an interested community that says
this is useful. It has also been clarified that 3GPP would like to use
it in their specifications.
So could I ask the WG to look at this document, and formally to indicate
whether they believe some work with this scope should be progressed as a
SIP WG item.
http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-dotson-sip-mutual-auth-02.txt
So if you support it please indicate to the SIP WG chairs.
If you have technical concerns (i.e. it should not proceed because it is
technically flawed beyond fixing) then please ideally mail the list,
although the SIP WG chairs will also accept input.
Responses please in 1 calendar week from this date.
Regards
Keith
________________________________
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Stuart Hoggan
Sent: Friday, May 02, 2008 5:15 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: [Sip] draft-dotson-sip-mutual-auth-02
Folks,
Based on the feedback received in Philadelphia, we have updated
draft-dotson-sip-mutual-auth. The changes clarify the usage of the
Proxy-Authentication-Info header, including support for multiple values.
Any further comments or suggestions will be appreciated. It
would also be nice to obtain WG feedback on pursuing this I-D as a WG
document.
Regards,
Stuart
_______________________________________________
Sip mailing list https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sip
This list is for NEW development of the core SIP Protocol
Use [EMAIL PROTECTED] for questions on current sip
Use [EMAIL PROTECTED] for new developments on the application of sip
