Those overlaps would work for me. John
> -----Original Message----- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On > Behalf Of Hadriel Kaplan > Sent: 24 June 2008 21:46 > To: Dean Willis; [email protected] > Cc: Keith Drage > Subject: Re: [Sip] Let's talk about a Dublin agenda > > > Oy vey. That's less time than we had in Philly, and we got > barely anything done there. > > Why can't some RAI groups overlap - for example mediactrl or > xcon at the same time as speermint or drinks, or let p2psip > overlap with any of those 4? > > -hadriel > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On > Behalf Of Dean > > Willis > > Sent: Tuesday, June 24, 2008 3:20 PM > > To: [email protected] > > Cc: Keith Drage > > Subject: [Sip] Let's talk about a Dublin agenda > > > > > > I've been tipped off that we may be down to as little as > two hours (or > > maybe 2.5) of meeting time in Dublin due to additional WG and BOF > > events that didn't make it onto the earlier published agenda (like > > MEDIACTRL). > > > > What are the absolutely most important things we need to talk about? > > What is the best possible use of our very valuable and very scarce > > time together? > > > > I suspect that going by-rote through the list of open milestones is > > not the best use of our time. > > > > Topics that I think we might want to talk about include but are not > > limited to: > > > > Agenda bash and announcements usually use 10 minutes > > > > 1) Using SAML for SIP. > > -- Milestone was Dec. 2007 > > -- Author has promised new rev before meeting > > -- Is the WG committed to doing this work? > > -- 10 minutes? > > > > 2) Test Matrix for SIP to Draft Standard > > -- Milestone was Feb 2008 > > -- How are we going to move forward? > > -- 10 minutes > > > > 3) Delivery of Request URI and Parameters to UAS Through Proxy > > -- Milestone was Feb 2008 > > -- Conversation has lagged. Do we see a workable solution? > > -- 30 minutes? > > > > 4) DTLS-SRTP > > -- Milestone was Feb 2008 > > -- Delayed by the RFC 4474/Gateway/B2BUA > > -- Decide: Do we hold DTLS-SRTP or publish with a caveat? > > -- EKR may not be attending, can we resolve on-list? (no time?) > > > > 5) Mechanisms for UA Initiated Privacy > > -- Milestone is July 2008 > > -- Author has promised new rev before meeting > > -- 20 minutes? > > > > 6) Termination of early Dialog Prior to Final Response (199) > > -- Milestone is November 2008 > > -- Substantial list activity > > -- 30 minutes? > > > > 7) Guidelines for SIP Extension Modalities > > -- No milestone > > -- Needs conceptual discussion > > -- Defer until #8 below is resolved? (no time?) > > > > 8) The INFO solution and Paul's compromise for historical > registration > > -- No milestone > > -- Previous WG consensus to "do something" > > -- 40 minutes? > > > > > > Am I missing something that is critically important? > > > > Which topics do we really need to talk about in order to > move forward? > > _______________________________________________ > > Sip mailing list https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sip > > This list is for NEW development of the core SIP Protocol > > Use [EMAIL PROTECTED] for questions on current sip > > Use [EMAIL PROTECTED] for new developments on the application of sip > _______________________________________________ > Sip mailing list https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sip > This list is for NEW development of the core SIP Protocol > Use [EMAIL PROTECTED] for questions on current sip > Use [EMAIL PROTECTED] for new developments on the application of sip > _______________________________________________ Sip mailing list https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sip This list is for NEW development of the core SIP Protocol Use [EMAIL PROTECTED] for questions on current sip Use [EMAIL PROTECTED] for new developments on the application of sip
