Thank you for your answer. I see there is some ongoing discussion and it is worth to progress the draft. I support such an mechanism it is very useful.
Thanks and Best Regards Roland > -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht----- > Von: Dean Willis [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Gesendet: Dienstag, 24. Juni 2008 18:12 > An: Jesske, Roland > Cc: [email protected] > Betreff: Re: [Sip] Draft: draft-holmberg-sip-keep-00.txt > > > On Jun 24, 2008, at 10:07 AM, Jesske, R wrote: > > > Dear all, > > what is the status of this draft? > > We are trying to determine whether there is a constituency for the > draft that justifies further WG effort in advancing it. > > > Will there be some consideration of this proposal of > defining a keep > > parameter? > > Yes, that's one of the conversations we're having now. > > > will this possibly incorporated into draft-ietf-sip-outbound? > > > > No. It's more or less been split off from "outbound". > > Were I to do this all over again, I would have separated out the > keepalive function from outbound early on. But we didn't, and > outbound > is pretty much done. > > -- > Dean > > _______________________________________________ Sip mailing list https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sip This list is for NEW development of the core SIP Protocol Use [EMAIL PROTECTED] for questions on current sip Use [EMAIL PROTECTED] for new developments on the application of sip
