Dean, > -----Original Message----- > From: Dean Willis [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: 25 June 2008 17:01 > To: Elwell, John > Cc: [email protected] > Subject: Re: [Sip] First draft, RETIRE Charter > > > On Jun 25, 2008, at 2:24 AM, Elwell, John wrote: > > >> > > > [JRE] It also suffers an additional limitation to do with E.164 > > numbers. > > So I would prefer to say: > > "RFC 4474 suffers additional limitations relating to its > use with E. > > 164 > > numbers and with gateways, session border controllers, and back-to- > > back > > user agents." > > > > Does it really have issues with E,164 numbers, or only when they are > used through gateways? For example, I thought we had agreed that if > the ENUM entry for an E.164 points to a domain including an > authentication service, then that AS could reasonably issue Identity > headers on that phone number. [JRE] That was suggested - I am not sure there was an agreement, and even that would need documenting.
John _______________________________________________ Sip mailing list https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sip This list is for NEW development of the core SIP Protocol Use [EMAIL PROTECTED] for questions on current sip Use [EMAIL PROTECTED] for new developments on the application of sip
