For additional information, this was originally targetted as an essential correction, but we agreed at IETF#70 that it should instead we progressed as a standalone BCP as it was not essential.
It does not not directly update RFC 3261, and is currently not intended to. Regards Keith > -----Original Message----- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On > Behalf Of Dean Willis > Sent: Wednesday, July 16, 2008 4:32 PM > To: SIP IETF > Subject: [Sip] WGLC on draft-ietf-sip-record-route-fix > > > I believe we're ready to do working group last call on the > Record- Route guidelines draft. Please get comments back to > the list before July 29. > > > See: > > http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-sip-record-rout > e-fix-03.txt > > > -- > Dean > > _______________________________________________ > Sip mailing list https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sip > This list is for NEW development of the core SIP Protocol Use > [EMAIL PROTECTED] for questions on current sip > Use [EMAIL PROTECTED] for new developments on the application of sip > _______________________________________________ Sip mailing list https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sip This list is for NEW development of the core SIP Protocol Use [EMAIL PROTECTED] for questions on current sip Use [EMAIL PROTECTED] for new developments on the application of sip
