No. I'm saying a new draft on redundant registration is needed, and we can leave outbound AS IS.
I thought about this more. I think what it means, is NOT using "Supported: outbound", but using the +sip.instance and reg-id in the REGISTER. Perhaps with a different "Support: redundant-registrations" or whatever. The reg-ids will distinguish the multiple registrations. The +sip.instance will correlate them. This will be in line with what we did with GRUU which also can use the +sip.instance. A new draft describing this should be fairly simple to do, and we wouldn't derail the process, and it would be very much in line with sip-outbound. Makes sense? > -----Original Message----- > From: Juha Heinanen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Tuesday, October 07, 2008 23:54 > To: Audet, Francois (SC100:3055) > Cc: DRAGE, Keith (Keith); Dean Willis; Paul Kyzivat; > [email protected]; Christer Holmberg > Subject: Re: [Sip] Dual registration without Outbound > > Francois Audet writes: > > > Rather, I think this should be a new draft, and it should > be > independent from outbound. > > so do you now finally agree to base outbound drfat on two new > drafts that are also independent of outbound: dialog > connection re-use and keepalive? > > -- juha > _______________________________________________ Sip mailing list https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sip This list is for NEW development of the core SIP Protocol Use [EMAIL PROTECTED] for questions on current sip Use [EMAIL PROTECTED] for new developments on the application of sip
