On Oct 18, 2008, at 9:51 AM, Paul Kyzivat wrote:
Well, the multiple flows are there for redundancy, right?
If one of the flows failsl, the whole point is that things should
continue. If the UA gets upset receiving in-dialog messages on a
different flow, then things aren't working right.
Fair enough. Perhaps a simple statement of this potential, and a
requirement for supporting this eventuality as a consequence of
supporting the outbound extension, could be added to the Outbound spec?
--
Dean
_______________________________________________
Sip mailing list https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sip
This list is for NEW development of the core SIP Protocol
Use [EMAIL PROTECTED] for questions on current sip
Use [EMAIL PROTECTED] for new developments on the application of sip
