Christer Holmberg wrote:
Hi,
Its not a matter of Info-Package *vs* Content-Type - Its Info-Package
*plus* Content-Type. Previously there was an assumption that C-T would
uniquely distinguish the "package". Read what Eric wrote about why that
is a bad assumption.
Fine.
But, what will the Content-Type value be, then? We need a value, and the
draft doesn't specify one.
OR, shall each info package define the Content-Type value, in addition
to the package name itself???
7.2.4. INFO Bodies
Each Info Package MUST define what type or types of bodies are
expected in INFO requests. Such packages MUST specify or cite
detailed specifications for the syntax and semantics associated with
such a body.
Info Packages also MUST define a default MIME type if the "Accept"
header fails to define any MIME types in the INVITE request.
_______________________________________________
Sip mailing list https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sip
This list is for NEW development of the core SIP Protocol
Use [EMAIL PROTECTED] for questions on current sip
Use [EMAIL PROTECTED] for new developments on the application of sip
