Eric Burger wrote: ...
I would also offer that since INFO does not change SIP state, which means there is not even a concept of a message succeeding but the INFO body doing something that "fails", the objection that it would be hard for a UA to report on one body "failing" with another body "succeeding" is a non-issue. Yes, this does mean that you cannot use INFO to tunnel IP. See RFC 3252 for more on this. I do not see this as a problem.
Not sure I follow this. If an INFO carries bodies for info packages A and B and the one for A is fine but the one for B is malformed, then is the INFO rejected or not?
Thanks, Anders _______________________________________________ Sip mailing list https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sip This list is for NEW development of the core SIP Protocol Use [EMAIL PROTECTED] for questions on current sip Use [EMAIL PROTECTED] for new developments on the application of sip
