Hi, >I let the dialog run for some 57 messages, hoping to see some convergence. > >What I am hearing is the vast majority of people feel that the presence of a Recv-Info in an INVITE, 200 OK, or OPTIONS is sufficient to signal the UA supports the new Info Framework. There are a few >hold-outs - speak now with strong use cases for a generic Option Tag or hold your piece. > >I am also hearing that it would be useful to give guidance to Info Package authors for when they may wish to define a Require tag for their package, a'la MSCML. Again, this would be guidance, not a >normative structure, as Option Tags already have a pretty nice definition. > >Am I missing anything else?
I guess there should also be some guidance text for defining feature tags, in case one wish to be able to use them in order to reach terminals which supports specific info packages. Regards, Christer _______________________________________________ Sip mailing list https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sip This list is for NEW development of the core SIP Protocol Use [EMAIL PROTECTED] for questions on current sip Use [EMAIL PROTECTED] for new developments on the application of sip
