> -----Original Message----- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Eric > Burger > Sent: Sunday, November 30, 2008 7:52 PM > > If one insists on using INFO, one clearly does not care about message > size, bandwidth utilization, or network element burden. Since 80% of > the uses of INFO will be for the simple stuff, and the other 20% will > most likely be over yellow cables (e.g., a media server connected to > an application server in the same rack), the "extra message" is a tiny > price to pay to not screw oneself in the future.
Ummm... the UA may not care, but Proxies sure would. And it's kinda the UA's decision of whether to use INFO or not, not the Proxies'. If we can keep the message count down while still providing the INFO users with what they need, it would be better IMO. -hadriel _______________________________________________ Sip mailing list https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sip This list is for NEW development of the core SIP Protocol Use [EMAIL PROTECTED] for questions on current sip Use [EMAIL PROTECTED] for new developments on the application of sip
