Wrong where/what/how?
> -----Original Message----- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On > Behalf Of Eric Burger > Sent: 1. joulukuuta 2008 16:13 > To: Hadriel Kaplan > Cc: SIP List > Subject: Re: [Sip] Multiple body-parts in one INFO > > Just because everyone else got it wrong does not mean we have > to be wrong, too... > > On Dec 1, 2008, at 6:14 AM, Christer Holmberg wrote: > > > > > Hi, > > > >>> Sounds ok. > >>> But, doesn't the Info-Package header syntax still have to > allow the > >>> piggy-backer to: > >>> 1) List multiple info packages > >>> 2) For each listed info package, provide the cid > >> > >> Nope. We've already said we're going to not bother doing multiple > >> packages. (or at least I think people have agreed with > that, I hope) > >> > >> So the next question was on multiple body-parts. > > > > I still want to see why we, if we are going to allow multiple body > > parts, can't allow multiple info packages, but let's leave > that for a > > moment... > > > >> Since INVITE, UPDATE, PRACK, SUBSCRIBE/NOTIFY, MESSAGE, and legacy > > INFO, can all carry bodies and not one of > >> them defined a CID mechanism for the body part that was specific to > > their message method context, we shouldn't need > >> to for INFO either. > > > > Yes. And, if we are going to use CID, it means yet another RFC to > > support. > > > > What's wrong with using Content-Disposition? > > > >> A "piggy-backer" is an extension to SIP that piggy-backs > bodies onto > >> any message method types. Geolocation is an example of > one. Since > >> it's the responsibility of the piggy-backer to handle > identifying its > >> specific body-part and dis-ambiguating it from the > method's, we don't > >> have to do anything. In other words, Geolocation would > already have > >> to deal with current INFO message and body syntax. > >> > >> For example, let's suppose someone creates an INFO package for > >> sending virtual location information in a game, using a > content-type > >> of application/pidf+xml. (whether they should have done it in SIP > >> vs. the media layer is orthogonal) And let's suppose for whatever > >> reason the SIP stack always adds Geolocation information > of the UA's > >> physical location. > >> Here is what it would look like: > > > > But, what if the information the piggy-backer wants to send > also uses > > info packages? > > > > Regards, > > > > Christer > > _______________________________________________ > > Sip mailing list https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sip > > This list is for NEW development of the core SIP Protocol Use > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] for questions on current sip Use > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] for new developments on the application of sip > > _______________________________________________ Sip mailing list https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sip This list is for NEW development of the core SIP Protocol Use [EMAIL PROTECTED] for questions on current sip Use [EMAIL PROTECTED] for new developments on the application of sip
