> -----Original Message----- > From: Paul Kyzivat [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Wednesday, December 03, 2008 4:39 PM > > Christer Holmberg wrote: > > So, there is no risk that someone would insert a legacy INFO body part > > with "render"? > > No matter what we do, legacy info usage will have body parts with > "render". > > I guess maybe you mean they might *combine* the use of a single INFO for > one legacy INFO usage *and* one info-package??? They can only do that if > we define that they may, which I expect we will not, if we are not > allowing multiple packages. If we define that they can't, its just a > matter of what the error is: either its > - erroneous attempt to use INFO for both legacy and info-package > - or its: too many package bodies for info package > > And note that you can screw up with cid references too, by including the > same Content-ID in two different body parts. > > People will always find a way to screw up. They will just have to deal > with it until they get smarter.
Exactly. Not just legacy INFO, BTW - Sub/Not/Pub/Mess/etc. -hadriel _______________________________________________ Sip mailing list https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sip This list is for NEW development of the core SIP Protocol Use [EMAIL PROTECTED] for questions on current sip Use [EMAIL PROTECTED] for new developments on the application of sip
