Hi Adam, Adam Roach wrote: > Ah -- "statelessly" means something very different to you than it does > to me. I think you need to explicitly call out that you're proposing a > modification to the basic INVITE transaction model defined in RFC 3261 > for this new response. > > This, combined with prohibiting provisional responses, would seem to > have the desired effect.
I don't think there is any proposed modification. The response should be sent according to the rules of RFC 3261 section 8.2.7. Amongst other things, this specifically prohibits provisional responses. I think the draft should explicitly mention this section. Regards, Michael _______________________________________________ Sip mailing list https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sip This list is for NEW development of the core SIP Protocol Use [email protected] for questions on current sip Use [email protected] for new developments on the application of sip
