SIP has a state machine??? You could fool me.... Where can I find it? Do not say 3261
Martin ----- Original Message ----- From: [email protected] <[email protected]> To: Bob Penfield <[email protected]> Cc: SIP IETF <[email protected]>; Brett Tate <[email protected]> Sent: Sat Mar 07 18:30:22 2009 Subject: Re: [Sip] draft-ietf-sip-info-events-03: comments and questions Bob said: I'm inclined to say that since the INFO is not suppose to change > dialog state, a 489 response to an INFO should not destroy the INVITE > dialog usage. With SUBSCRIBE/NOTIFY its a failure of the dialog > establishing/target-refresh request which is essential to the dialog > usage. But INFO is not essential to the INVITE dialog usage, so > applying the last sentence above makes sense to me. Doesn't a 489 in any in-dialog Non-Invite-Transaction destroy the dialog usage? It seems like we break the state machine if we make INFO a special case. -- Dean _______________________________________________ Sip mailing list https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sip This list is for NEW development of the core SIP Protocol Use [email protected] for questions on current sip Use [email protected] for new developments on the application of sip _______________________________________________ Sip mailing list https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sip This list is for NEW development of the core SIP Protocol Use [email protected] for questions on current sip Use [email protected] for new developments on the application of sip
