And, just to clarify the phrase "...changing a Uniform Resource Identifier (URI) in a request..." should perhaps be worded more specifically as: " ...changing the Request-URI in a SIP request..."
________________________________ From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Barnes, Mary (RICH2:AR00) Sent: Thursday, March 12, 2009 10:20 AM To: Hans Erik van Elburg Cc: [email protected]; Elwell, John Subject: Re: [Sip] Terminology (was RE: Fwd:I-DACTION:draft-rosenberg-sip-target-uri-delivery-01.txt When I use "retarget" I am using the definition that I put into 4244bis. So, if you could ignore the tag or change it to 'iscontact' or whatever, what would you change in that definition? Also, consider that if you were to change everyplace that I use "retarget"/"retargeted"/"retargeting" in 4244bis with 'iscontact' the text would not make sense. So, even if we change the name of the tag, we still need to understand the concept or define another term that means that the request-uri in the incoming request (which should be the same as the last hi-entry in the request) is being chnaged due to service lookup, configuration, blah, blah, blah and that to meet the requirements in the target-uri document, we want to tag this entry so that this request-uri is not "lost" - i.e., this is the one the services identified in the target-uri document care about. So, right now, here's what's in 4244bis: The term "retarget" is used in this document to refer to the process of a Proxy Server/User Agent Client (UAC) changing a Uniform Resource Identifier (URI) in a request based on a lookup in a location service and thus changing the target of the request. We have previously discussed that we do need to expand the "based on a lookup in a location service" to include configuration, etc., so let's not debate that. But, what explicitly is the concern with that definition? Mary. ________________________________ From: Hans Erik van Elburg [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Thursday, March 12, 2009 9:55 AM To: Barnes, Mary (RICH2:AR00) Cc: Elwell, John; [email protected] Subject: Re: [Sip] Terminology (was RE: Fwd: I-DACTION:draft-rosenberg-sip-target-uri-delivery-01.txt I'm fine with discussing implementation if everyone is meaning the same if they use the same words. As to the "retarget" term such does not seem to be the case. /Hans Erik van Elburg _______________________________________________ Sip mailing list https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sip This list is for NEW development of the core SIP Protocol Use [email protected] for questions on current sip Use [email protected] for new developments on the application of sip
