My main comment at this time, is that this bis document doesn't seem
much different from the original. Section 10 calls out a bunch of things
that I would put in the 'minor' category - certainly not worth a
wholesale bis document if this is all we do.
I think it'd be worth having a high level discussion on the changes we'd
like to make to this document, and assess whether there are enough to
warrant a bis. For example, many have complained about the complexity of
HI; are there changes meant to help that? So far, frankly, the few
comments on this draft have been suggestions for additions for the most
part, and NOT simplifications. Is this meant as an omnibus for a bunch
of extensions to HI?
Thanks,
Jonathan R.
--
Jonathan D. Rosenberg, Ph.D. 111 Wood Avenue South
Cisco Fellow Iselin, NJ 08830
Cisco, Voice Technology Group
[email protected]
http://www.jdrosen.net PHONE: (408) 902-3084
http://www.cisco.com
_______________________________________________
Sip mailing list https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sip
This list is for NEW development of the core SIP Protocol
Use [email protected] for questions on current sip
Use [email protected] for new developments on the application of sip
