> -----Original Message-----
> From: Dale Worley [mailto:[email protected]]
> Sent: Wednesday, March 25, 2009 12:13 AM
> 
> (I'm envisioning a world in which the UAC's end may be involved in
> complex service provisioning in which there may be more than one transit
> network and more than one element that provides complex call routing.
> Though a transit network should be able to hide its internal structure,
> the UAC has the right to know what element the transit network delivered
> the request to, since that is what the UAC is paying the transit network
> to do.)

IMO the UAC has no right to know any such thing.  It has no rights - it's not a 
human.  The calling human has a right to know the far-end called human it got 
delivered to.  But they don't care nor have a right to know the *host* element 
it got delivered to, or host elements it forked to but did not succeed at, etc. 
 It's none of their business, frankly.

And if we're thinking the far-end terminating Enterprise or provider will want 
to tell some originating Enterprise or provider what's going on inside their 
network, well... once again we all live in different worlds. :)

-hadriel 

_______________________________________________
Sip mailing list  https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sip
This list is for NEW development of the core SIP Protocol
Use [email protected] for questions on current sip
Use [email protected] for new developments on the application of sip

Reply via email to