Yes ________________________________
From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Mary Barnes Sent: 26 March 2009 23:17 To: Christer Holmberg; [email protected] Subject: Re: [Sip] New version of draft-holmberg-sip-keep Hi folks, Christer has updated the document based on the action item from Wednesday's SIP session (chaired by SIPPING chairs and modeled as the proposed DISPATCH WG). If folks could please review the document and raise any concerns on the document now, that would be appreciated. We ask specifically for an answer to the question: Do you support the document being adopted as a WG document in RAI (WG tbd)? A simple "yes" is fine, however, if you don't think we should adopt this document, could you please provide the reason. For your convenience, here's the link to the document: http://tools.ietf.org/id/draft-holmberg-sip-keep-04.txt And, the diff: http://tools.ietf.org//rfcdiff?url1=http://tools.ietf.org/id/draft-holmb erg-sip-keep-03.txt&url2=http://tools.ietf.org/id/draft-holmberg-sip-kee p-04.txt tinyurl: http://tinyurl.com/dfyvxz Regards, Mary SIPPING WG co-chair -----Original Message----- From: [email protected] on behalf of Christer Holmberg Sent: Thu 3/26/2009 12:41 PM To: [email protected] Subject: [Sip] New version of draft-holmberg-sip-keep Hi, I've submitted a new version (-04) of the keep draft. The requirement text is now alligned with the text shown on the slides during the SFO SIP WG presentation. There are no other changes in the document from the previous version. Regards, Christer
_______________________________________________ Sip mailing list https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sip This list is for NEW development of the core SIP Protocol Use [email protected] for questions on current sip Use [email protected] for new developments on the application of sip
