> -----Original Message-----
> From: Dean Willis [mailto:[email protected]]
> Sent: Thursday, April 02, 2009 21:02
> To: Audet, Francois (SC100:3055)
> Cc: Dwight, Timothy M (Tim); Cullen Jennings; [email protected];
> DRAGE, Keith (Keith)
> Subject: Re: [Sip] francois' comments and why RFC4474 not
> used in the field
>
> > And what draft-wing-sip-identity-media does is show how and
> 4474-like
> > mechanism that doesn't protect the IP address can be used in
> > conjunction with DTLS-SRTP, to provide an adequate level of
> security.
> >
> > So, I'll repeat the question from a previous email: what's
> wrong with
> > draft-wing-sip-identity-media???
>
> If I understand the argument, extending the d-w-s-i-m
> approach to non- DTLS media legitimizes the obfuscation of
> the one media identifier we do have -- the IP address. Some
> people seem to find this unacceptable.
No, that's not what I'm saying.
I'm saying draft-wing-sip-identity-media WITH DTLS-SRTP.
^^^^
What's wrong with that approach?
Unless I'm missing something, it does seem to achieve end-to-end
media and identity security.
_______________________________________________
Sip mailing list https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sip
This list is for NEW development of the core SIP Protocol
Use [email protected] for questions on current sip
Use [email protected] for new developments on the application of sip
