Well, I know what this means, but will your average reader understand
it? I think we are trying to say something along the lines that if the
transport protocol changes you SHOULD use the double Record-Route
technique, where the differences in transport protocol are reflected in
different values of the transport parameter (udp/tcp/sctp) and/or
different values of the URI scheme (sip/sips). Correct?

John

> -----Original Message-----
> From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On 
> Behalf Of BONNAERENS Ben
> Sent: 05 August 2009 15:23
> To: [email protected]
> Subject: [Sip] draft-ietf-sip-record-route-fix-08 Changes
> 
> Hi,
> version -08 of record-route fix has just been submitted.
> 
> Change log:
> - Changed its status from BCP to PS,
> - Take into account IESG reviews and subsequent comments on 
> the mailing
> lists, 
> they were summarized in Robert Sparks's document (rrf.txt), 
> so it has been integrated in version -08 with minor 
> refactoring from the
> authors (me and Ben).
> 
> The thoughest part was related to the SIP/SIPS question 
> raised by Cullen
> (http://datatracker.ietf.org/idtracker/draft-ietf-sip-record-r
> oute-fix/c
> omment/98624/),
> so here is the text that was added in version -08 to answer this
> question:
> "Thus, if the transport protocol changed between its
>    incoming and outgoing sides, the proxy SHOULD use the double
>    Record-Route technique and SHOULD add a transport parameter to each
>    of the Record-Route URIs it inserts. With the exception that if TLS
> is
>    used as the transport protocol on either side of the proxy, the URI
>    chosen to place in the Record-Route header field value 
> reflecting the
>    interface using TLS will need to leverage the [RFC3263] 
> mechanisms to
>    indicate that TLS must be used rather attempting to use the
> deprecated
>    "transport=tls" URI parameter. See [RFC3261] Section 26.2.2 and
>    [I-D.ietf-sip-sips] Section 3.1.4 for more discussion."
> 
> Brds,
> Thomas & Ben
> _______________________________________________
> Sip mailing list  https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sip
> This list is for NEW development of the core SIP Protocol
> Use [email protected] for questions on current sip
> Use [email protected] for new developments on the application of sip
> 
_______________________________________________
Sip mailing list  https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sip
This list is for NEW development of the core SIP Protocol
Use [email protected] for questions on current sip
Use [email protected] for new developments on the application of sip

Reply via email to